Crime and Punishment in UK Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Crime and Punishment in UK - Essay ExampleThe criminal Justice practice 2003 was enacted to reduce the evil by deterrence and by taking the preventive steps like administrate in the licence period and taking into custody when there is a need. The minimum time positively charged for a sentence in murder cases and the permission for a trial in the absence of a Jury, the compulsion on the persons called for Jury duties, the custodial periods, the steps taken for reducing re-offenders, custody plus, the new arbitrary powers for the Jury, the role probation agencies in reforming the convicts, the permission for the retrial are some of the new clauses included in the law and broadly speaking after three age of enacting the law, there is a need to analyse the effect of it and to which extent it was cover its extra effect than the previous laws. In the backdrop of increased sentences in the last ten divisions and decrease of the fines and community punishments the deterrence attaine d by implementing the law is to be discussed.First of all there should be a reason for passing a sentence or giving punishment which reduces crime or poke show up deterrence. The public protection should likewise be considered and it was considered in the act. Some adjudicate or magistrates regain that the act gives a practical similarlyl for improving their decision making readiness.1 A terrace which is to invest a report does not like to observe the details of the punishment given. But the effort to leave rapport between bench and probation by the act is capable of showing the real positive effect. The bench now is provided with a chance to know the decisions taken at the time of probation. But the process is too complex, but is valuable. Crime and punishment in UKThe judges decide the punishments in individual cases. This can be termed as independence of Judiciary. But the independence is not the one that makes an escape from the responsibilities. The sentencers may thi nk at the time of the sentence that the punishment given may help in reducing the crime and offer deterrence. But it is not the whole thing which can reduce and deter crime incidence. There should be provision in the law to make all the agencies of the Justice system work in coordination to receive reform in the convicts and attaining the reducing rate of crime. If the Judges think that just judicial independence is the panacea, because the system will suffer and the purpose is not served. How ever the provision of liaison between the terrace and the probation agencies is capable of bringing the change in the offenders who commit crime and serve sentences from slight than 1 year to more than 2 years. The reduction of crime and deterrence depends upon the factor that up to which extent the convict was reformed. broadly speaking the rate of repeating crime in the persons convicted in murder cases will be very less (not nil) as a person convicted for more than 10 years, though not reformed, may loose the capacity of committing the murder. It may not be true in all the cases here it was mentioned to make a usher that the reformation is more necessary in the case of the persons sentenced for the period of months to 2 to 4 years. The reformation brought out in these persons can be a tool in hand for the system to reduce the crime incidence and to attain the required deterrence. The Judiciary/probation liaison was provided in the act for this reformation, but the extent of its performance will result in the range of reformation. But it can be known that the sentencing by the Judges and magistrates in all the levels of the courts increased and the community punishments and fines were decreased,1 telling the fact that the liaison was not working up to the mark or it may take some more time to show its effect. Though the courts of England and Wales nonplus more probability of imposing penalties other than custodies, in the last decade the custodial sentences inc reased. The community sentences were also resulted in the community punishments.2 In the last ten years the custodial sen